Compare Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4




- Hide similar features
- Show similarities
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 - Basic information
- Fuel Type
- Diesel Trucks
- Diesel Trucks
- Diesel Trucks
- Diesel Trucks
- Body Type
- TRACTOR-HEAD-TRAILER Trucks
- TRACTOR-HEAD-TRAILER Trucks
- BOX-BODY Trucks
- TRACTOR-HEAD-TRAILER Trucks
- Price
- Rp 901,2 Million Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH Price
- Rp 965,1 Million Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear Price
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 - Transmission
-
- Transmission
- Manual
- Manual
- Manual
- Automatic
-
- Gearbox
- 7-Speed
- 7-Speed
- 6-Speed
- 12-Speed
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 - Safety
-
- ABS
-
- Seat Belts
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 - Comfort & Convenience
-
- Adjustable Driver Seat
-
- Air Conditioner
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 - Entertainment & Communication
-
- Navigation System
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 - Engine Details
-
- Axle Configuration
- 4x2
- 6x4
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 - Exterior
-
- Fog Lights
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 - Dimensions & Capacity
-
- Fuel Tank (litres)
- 200 L
- 200 L
- 200 L
- 1250 L
-
- Gross Weight
- 16000 kg
- 34000 kg
- 16000 kg
- 200000 kg
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 - Engine Details
-
- Engine Cylinders
- 6
- 6
- 6
- 8
-
- Engine
- 4-Step Inline Diesel Engine; Direct Injenction; Intercooler Turbo Charger, Common Rail
- Inline 4 Stroke Diesel Engine; Variable Nozzle Turbocharger; Intercoolers; Common Rail
- SOHC (Single Overhead Chamsaft), 6 Direct Injection Cylinders
- 16.0L Diesel Engine, 8 Cylinder 32 Valve
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 - Performance
-
- Fuel Type
- Diesel
- Diesel
- Diesel
- Diesel
-
- Displacement
- 7684
- 7684
- 7545
- 16001
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 - Steering
-
- Power Steering
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
-
- Steering
- Power
- Power Steering
- Hydraulic Power
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 - Suspension & Brakes
-
- Brakes
- Air Brakes
- Air Brakes
- Air Brakes
- Air Brakes
-
- Front Suspension
- Rigid Axle with Semi Elliptic Leaf Spring
- Rigid Axle with Semi Elliptic Leaf Spring
- Laminated leap springs with shock absorbers
- Heavy duty parabolic leaf spring
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 - Wheel & Tyre
-
- Front Tyre
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 10.00-R20-16PR
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 325/95R24
-
- Rear Tyre
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 10.00-R20-16PR
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 325/95R24
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 - Miscellaneous
-
- Emission Norms
- Euro 4
- Euro 4
-
- Driver Information Display
- Yes