Compare Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs XCMG XGA4250E




- Hide similar features
- Show similarities
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs XCMG XGA4250E - Basic information
- Body Type
- TRACTOR-HEAD-TRAILER Trucks
- TRACTOR-HEAD-TRAILER Trucks
- BOX-BODY Trucks
- TRACTOR-HEAD-TRAILER Trucks
- Price
- Rp 901,2 Million Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH Price
- Rp 941,3 Million Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear Price
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs XCMG XGA4250E - Transmission
-
- Transmission
- Manual
- Manual
- Manual
- Automatic
-
- Gearbox
- 7-Speed
- 7-Speed
- 6-Speed
- SIngle Speed
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs XCMG XGA4250E - Safety
-
- ABS
-
- Seat Belts
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs XCMG XGA4250E - Comfort & Convenience
-
- Adjustable Driver Seat
-
- Air Conditioner
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs XCMG XGA4250E - Entertainment & Communication
-
- Navigation System
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs XCMG XGA4250E - Engine Details
-
- Axle Configuration
- 4x2
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs XCMG XGA4250E - Exterior
-
- Fog Lights
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs XCMG XGA4250E - Dimensions & Capacity
-
- Fuel Tank (litres)
- 200 L
- 200 L
- 200 L
-
- Gross Weight
- 16000 kg
- 34000 kg
- 16000 kg
- 150000 kg
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs XCMG XGA4250E - Engine Details
-
- Engine Cylinders
- 6
- 6
- 6
-
- Engine
- 4-Step Inline Diesel Engine; Direct Injenction; Intercooler Turbo Charger, Common Rail
- Inline 4 Stroke Diesel Engine; Variable Nozzle Turbocharger; Intercoolers; Common Rail
- SOHC (Single Overhead Chamsaft), 6 Direct Injection Cylinders
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs XCMG XGA4250E - Performance
-
- Fuel Type
- Diesel
- Diesel
- Diesel
- Electric
-
- Displacement
- 7684
- 7684
- 7545
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs XCMG XGA4250E - Steering
-
- Power Steering
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
-
- Steering
- Power
- Power Steering
- Power Steering
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs XCMG XGA4250E - Suspension & Brakes
-
- Brakes
- Air Brakes
- Air Brakes
- Air Brakes
- Air Brakes
-
- Front Suspension
- Rigid Axle with Semi Elliptic Leaf Spring
- Rigid Axle with Semi Elliptic Leaf Spring
- Laminated leap springs with shock absorbers
- Leaf Springs
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs XCMG XGA4250E - Wheel & Tyre
-
- Front Tyre
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 10.00-R20-16PR
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 12.00R20-18PR
-
- Rear Tyre
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 10.00-R20-16PR
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 12.00R20-18PR
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs XCMG XGA4250E - Miscellaneous
-
- Emission Norms
- Euro 4
-
- Driver Information Display
- Yes