Compare Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear
Suggested Truck
GIGA (4x2) Rigid-6 Cyl
Dutro Cargo 110 SDR
Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear
Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear
Another Truck
- Hide similar features
- Show similarities
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear - Basic information
- Fuel Type
- Diesel Trucks
- Diesel Trucks
- Diesel Trucks
- Price
- Rp 897 Million Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear Price
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear - Transmission
-
- Transmission
- Manual
- Automatic
- Manual
-
- Gearbox
- 7-Speed
- 6-Speed
- 6-Speed
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear - Safety
-
- ABS
-
- Seat Belts
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear - Comfort & Convenience
-
- Adjustable Driver Seat
-
- Air Conditioner
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear - Engine Details
-
- Axle Configuration
- 4x2
- 4x2
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear - Entertainment & Communication
-
- Navigation System
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear - Exterior
-
- Fog Lights
Add Another Truck To Comparison
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear - Dimensions & Capacity
-
- Fuel Tank (litres)
- 200 L
-
- Gross Weight
- 16000 kg
- 16000 kg
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear - Engine Details
-
- Engine Cylinders
- 6
- 6
- 6
-
- Engine
- 4-Step Inline Diesel Engine; Direct Injenction; Intercooler Turbo Charger, Common Rail
- 6-cylinder in line, 4-stroke, water-cooled, turbo-charged & inter-cooled, direct injection
- 4 Stroke-cycle water cooled direct injection turbocharged diesel engine
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear - Performance
-
- Fuel Type
- Diesel
- Diesel
- Diesel
-
- Displacement
- 7684
- 9700
- 7545
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear - Steering
-
- Power Steering
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
-
- Steering
- Power Steering
- Power Steering
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear - Suspension & Brakes
-
- Brakes
- Air Brakes
- Air Brakes
- Air Brakes
-
- Front Suspension
- Rigid Axle with Semi Elliptic Leaf Spring
- Semi Elliptical Leaf Springs with Double Acting Shock Absorber
- Laminated Leaf Springs with Shock Absorbers
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear - Wheel & Tyre
-
- Front Tyre
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 12.00R20
- 10.00-20-16PR
-
- Rear Tyre
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 12.00R20
- 10.00-20-16PR
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear - Miscellaneous
-
- Driver Information Display
- Yes