Compare Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4
- Hide similar features
- Show similarities
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 - Basic information
- Fuel Type
- Diesel Trucks
- Diesel Trucks
- Diesel Trucks
- Diesel Trucks
- Price
- Rp 965,1 Million Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear Price
- Rp 941,3 Million Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear Price
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 - Transmission
-
- Transmission
- Manual
- Manual
- Manual
- Automatic
-
- Gearbox
- 7-Speed
- 6-Speed
- 6-Speed
- 12-Speed
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 - Safety
-
- ABS
-
- Seat Belts
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 - Comfort & Convenience
-
- Adjustable Driver Seat
-
- Air Conditioner
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 - Engine Details
-
- Axle Configuration
- 4x2
- 4x2
- 6x4
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 - Entertainment & Communication
-
- Navigation System
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 - Exterior
-
- Fog Lights
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 - Dimensions & Capacity
-
- Fuel Tank (litres)
- 200 L
- 200 L
- 200 L
- 1250 L
-
- Gross Weight
- 16000 kg
- 16000 kg
- 16000 kg
- 200000 kg
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 - Engine Details
-
- Engine Cylinders
- 6
- 6
- 6
- 8
-
- Engine
- 4-Step Inline Diesel Engine; Direct Injenction; Intercooler Turbo Charger, Common Rail
- SOHC (Single Overhead Chamsaft), 6 Direct Injection Cylinders
- SOHC (Single Overhead Chamsaft), 6 Direct Injection Cylinders
- 16.0L Diesel Engine, 8 Cylinder 32 Valve
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 - Performance
-
- Fuel Type
- Diesel
- Diesel
- Diesel
- Diesel
-
- Displacement
- 7684
- 7545
- 7545
- 16001
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 - Steering
-
- Power Steering
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
-
- Steering
- Power Steering
- Power Steering
- Hydraulic Power
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 - Suspension & Brakes
-
- Brakes
- Air Brakes
- Air Brakes
- Air Brakes
- Air Brakes
-
- Front Suspension
- Rigid Axle with Semi Elliptic Leaf Spring
- Laminated leap springs with shock absorbers
- Laminated leap springs with shock absorbers
- Heavy duty parabolic leaf spring
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 - Wheel & Tyre
-
- Front Tyre
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 325/95R24
-
- Rear Tyre
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 325/95R24
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 - Miscellaneous
-
- Driver Information Display
- Yes
- Yes
-
- Emission Norms
- Euro 4