Compare Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Heavy Haulage Transport
- Hide similar features
- Show similarities
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Heavy Haulage Transport - Basic information
- Fuel Type
- Diesel Trucks
- Diesel Trucks
- Diesel Trucks
- Diesel Trucks
- Price
- Rp 965,1 Million Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear Price
- Rp 941,3 Million Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear Price
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Heavy Haulage Transport - Transmission
-
- Transmission
- Manual
- Manual
- Manual
- Automatic
-
- Gearbox
- 7-Speed
- 6-Speed
- 6-Speed
- 12-Speed
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Heavy Haulage Transport - Safety
-
- ABS
-
- Seat Belts
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Heavy Haulage Transport - Engine Details
-
- Axle Configuration
- 4x2
- 4x2
- 6x4
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Heavy Haulage Transport - Comfort & Convenience
-
- Air Conditioner
-
- Cruise Control
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Heavy Haulage Transport - Entertainment & Communication
-
- Navigation System
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Heavy Haulage Transport - Exterior
-
- Fog Lights
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Heavy Haulage Transport - Performance
-
- Fuel Type
- Diesel
- Diesel
- Diesel
- Diesel
-
- Displacement
- 7684
- 7545
- 7545
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Heavy Haulage Transport - Engine Details
-
- Engine
- 4-Step Inline Diesel Engine; Direct Injenction; Intercooler Turbo Charger, Common Rail
- SOHC (Single Overhead Chamsaft), 6 Direct Injection Cylinders
- SOHC (Single Overhead Chamsaft), 6 Direct Injection Cylinders
-
- Engine Cylinders
- 6
- 6
- 6
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Heavy Haulage Transport - Dimensions & Capacity
-
- Fuel Tank (litres)
- 200 L
- 200 L
- 200 L
-
- Wheelbase
- 4630 mm
- 5550 mm
- 4280 mm
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Heavy Haulage Transport - Wheel & Tyre
-
- Front Tyre
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 10.00-20-16PR
-
- Rear Tyre
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 10.00-20-16PR
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Heavy Haulage Transport - Suspension & Brakes
-
- Brakes
- Air Brakes
- Air Brakes
- Air Brakes
- Air Brakes
-
- Front Suspension
- Rigid Axle with Semi Elliptic Leaf Spring
- Laminated leap springs with shock absorbers
- Laminated leap springs with shock absorbers
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Heavy Haulage Transport - Steering
-
- Power Steering
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
-
- Turning Radius
- 9200
- 7300
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Heavy Haulage Transport - Miscellaneous
-
- Driver Information Display
- Yes
- Yes