Compare Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Volvo FE
- Hide similar features
- Show similarities
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Volvo FE - Basic information
- Price
- Rp 965,1 Million Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear Price
- Rp 941,3 Million Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear Price
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Volvo FE - Transmission
-
- Transmission
- Manual
- Manual
- Manual
- Automatic
-
- Gearbox
- 7-Speed
- 6-Speed
- 6-Speed
- 2-Speed
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Volvo FE - Safety
-
- ABS
-
- Seat Belts
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Volvo FE - Engine Details
-
- Axle Configuration
- 4x2
- 4x2
- 4x2
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Volvo FE - Comfort & Convenience
-
- Air Conditioner
-
- Cruise Control
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Volvo FE - Entertainment & Communication
-
- Navigation System
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Volvo FE - Exterior
-
- Fog Lights
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Volvo FE - Performance
-
- Driving Range
- 275 km
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Volvo FE - Performance
-
- Fuel Type
- Diesel
- Diesel
- Diesel
- Electric
-
- Displacement
- 7684
- 7545
- 7545
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Volvo FE - Engine Details
-
- Engine
- 4-Step Inline Diesel Engine; Direct Injenction; Intercooler Turbo Charger, Common Rail
- SOHC (Single Overhead Chamsaft), 6 Direct Injection Cylinders
- SOHC (Single Overhead Chamsaft), 6 Direct Injection Cylinders
-
- Engine Cylinders
- 6
- 6
- 6
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Volvo FE - Dimensions & Capacity
-
- Fuel Tank (litres)
- 200 L
- 200 L
- 200 L
-
- Wheelbase
- 4630 mm
- 5550 mm
- 4280 mm
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Volvo FE - Wheel & Tyre
-
- Front Tyre
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 7.00R16-12PR
-
- Rear Tyre
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 7.00R16-12PR
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Volvo FE - Suspension & Brakes
-
- Brakes
- Air Brakes
- Air Brakes
- Air Brakes
- Air Brakes
-
- Front Suspension
- Rigid Axle with Semi Elliptic Leaf Spring
- Laminated leap springs with shock absorbers
- Laminated leap springs with shock absorbers
- Air suspension
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Volvo FE - Steering
-
- Power Steering
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
-
- Turning Radius
- 9200
- 7300
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Volvo FE - Miscellaneous
-
- Driver Information Display
- Yes
- Yes