Compare Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs UD Quester GWE vs Volvo FH16
- Hide similar features
- Show similarities
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs UD Quester GWE vs Volvo FH16 - Basic information
- Fuel Type
- Diesel Trucks
- Diesel Trucks
- Diesel Trucks
- Diesel Trucks
- Body Type
- TRACTOR-HEAD-TRAILER Trucks
- BOX-BODY Trucks
- TRACTOR-HEAD-TRAILER Trucks
- TRACTOR-HEAD-TRAILER Trucks
- Price
- Rp 941,3 Million Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear Price
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs UD Quester GWE vs Volvo FH16 - Transmission
-
- Transmission
- Manual
- Manual
- Manual
- Automatic
-
- Gearbox
- 7-Speed
- 6-Speed
- 12-Speed
- 12-Speed
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs UD Quester GWE vs Volvo FH16 - Safety
-
- ABS
-
- Seat Belts
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs UD Quester GWE vs Volvo FH16 - Engine Details
-
- Axle Configuration
- 4x2
- 6x4
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs UD Quester GWE vs Volvo FH16 - Comfort & Convenience
-
- Air Conditioner
-
- Cruise Control
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs UD Quester GWE vs Volvo FH16 - Entertainment & Communication
-
- Navigation System
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs UD Quester GWE vs Volvo FH16 - Exterior
-
- Fog Lights
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs UD Quester GWE vs Volvo FH16 - Performance
-
- Fuel Type
- Diesel
- Diesel
- Diesel
- Diesel
-
- Displacement
- 7684
- 7545
- 10837
- 17300
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs UD Quester GWE vs Volvo FH16 - Engine Details
-
- Engine
- 4-Step Inline Diesel Engine; Direct Injenction; Intercooler Turbo Charger, Common Rail
- SOHC (Single Overhead Chamsaft), 6 Direct Injection Cylinders
- Common Rail Diesel Engine, 6 Cylinder DOHC
-
- Engine Cylinders
- 6
- 6
- 6
- 6
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs UD Quester GWE vs Volvo FH16 - Dimensions & Capacity
-
- Fuel Tank (litres)
- 200 L
- 200 L
- 400 L
-
- Wheelbase
- 4630 mm
- 4280 mm
- 3400 mm
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs UD Quester GWE vs Volvo FH16 - Wheel & Tyre
-
- Front Tyre
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 12.00 R 20 - 18 PR
- 315/80 R22.5
-
- Rear Tyre
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 12.00 R 20 - 18 PR
- 315/80 R22.5
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs UD Quester GWE vs Volvo FH16 - Suspension & Brakes
-
- Brakes
- Air Brakes
- Air Brakes
- Air Brakes
- Air Brakes
-
- Front Suspension
- Rigid Axle with Semi Elliptic Leaf Spring
- Laminated leap springs with shock absorbers
- Parabolic leaf springs with anchor at front and shackle at rear, telescopic type shock absorber; front stabiliser
- Air suspension
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs UD Quester GWE vs Volvo FH16 - Steering
-
- Power Steering
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
-
- Turning Radius
- 7300
- 7800
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs UD Quester GWE vs Volvo FH16 - Miscellaneous
-
- Driver Information Display
- Yes
- Yes
-
- Emission Norms
- Euro 5
- Euro 6