Compare Hino Ranger Cargo FL 235 JN vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fuso FM 517 HL
- Hide similar features
- Show similarities
Hino Ranger Cargo FL 235 JN vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fuso FM 517 HL - Basic information
- Fuel Type
- Diesel Trucks
- Diesel Trucks
- Diesel Trucks
- Diesel Trucks
- Price
- Rp 791,34 Million Hino Ranger Cargo FL 235 JN Price
- Rp 941,3 Million Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear Price
- Rp 856 Million Mitsubishi Fuso FM 517 HL Price
Hino Ranger Cargo FL 235 JN vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fuso FM 517 HL - Transmission
-
- Transmission
- Manual
- Automatic
- Manual
- Manual
-
- Clutch
- Single Dry Plate, with Coil Spring
- Single Dry Clutch
Hino Ranger Cargo FL 235 JN vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fuso FM 517 HL - Engine Details
-
- Axle Configuration
- 6x2
- 4x2
- 4x2
- 4x2
Hino Ranger Cargo FL 235 JN vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fuso FM 517 HL - Comfort & Convenience
-
- Air Conditioner
-
- Cruise Control
Hino Ranger Cargo FL 235 JN vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fuso FM 517 HL - Entertainment & Communication
-
- Navigation System
Hino Ranger Cargo FL 235 JN vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fuso FM 517 HL - Safety
-
- ABS
-
- Seat Belts
Hino Ranger Cargo FL 235 JN vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fuso FM 517 HL - Exterior
-
- Fog Lights
Hino Ranger Cargo FL 235 JN vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fuso FM 517 HL - Performance
-
- Fuel Type
- Diesel
- Diesel
- Diesel
- Diesel
-
- Displacement
- 7684
- 7545
- 7545
Hino Ranger Cargo FL 235 JN vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fuso FM 517 HL - Engine Details
-
- Engine
- 4-Step Inline Diesel Engine; Direct Injenction; Intercooler Turbo Charger
- SOHC (Single Overhead Chamsaft), 6 Direct Injection Cylinders
- 4 stroke Turbo diesel engine, 6 cylinder water cooling, direct injection with Turbo Intercooler
-
- Engine Cylinders
- 6
- 6
- 6
- 6
Hino Ranger Cargo FL 235 JN vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fuso FM 517 HL - Dimensions & Capacity
-
- Fuel Tank (litres)
- 200 L
- 200 L
- 200 L
-
- Wheelbase
- 1350 mm
- 4280 mm
- 5080 mm
Hino Ranger Cargo FL 235 JN vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fuso FM 517 HL - Suspension & Brakes
-
- Chassis Type
- Chassis with Cabin
- Chassis with Cabin
- Chassis with Cabin
-
- Seat Type
- Standard
- Standard
- Standard
- Standard
Hino Ranger Cargo FL 235 JN vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fuso FM 517 HL - Wheel & Tyre
-
- Front Tyre
- 11.00-20.16pr
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 10.00-20-16PR
-
- Rear Tyre
- 11.00-20.16pr
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 10.00-20-16PR
Hino Ranger Cargo FL 235 JN vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fuso FM 517 HL - Steering
-
- Steering
- Power Steering
- Power Steering
- Power Steering
- Power Steering
-
- Power Steering
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
Hino Ranger Cargo FL 235 JN vs Homan Terminal Tractor 75.280 4x2 vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fuso FM 517 HL - Miscellaneous
-
- Driver Information Display
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes