Compare Hino Ranger Cargo FL 265 JW vs Mitsubishi Canter FE 74 L
- Hide similar features
- Show similarities
Hino Ranger Cargo FL 265 JW vs Mitsubishi Canter FE 74 L - Basic information
- Fuel Type
- Diesel Trucks
- Diesel Trucks
- Body Type
- DECK-BODY Trucks
- BOX-BODY Trucks
Hino Ranger Cargo FL 265 JW vs Mitsubishi Canter FE 74 L - Comfort & Convenience
-
- Adjustable Driver Seat
-
- Air Conditioner
Hino Ranger Cargo FL 265 JW vs Mitsubishi Canter FE 74 L - Entertainment & Communication
-
- Navigation System
Hino Ranger Cargo FL 265 JW vs Mitsubishi Canter FE 74 L - Safety
-
- Seat Belts
-
- ABS
Hino Ranger Cargo FL 265 JW vs Mitsubishi Canter FE 74 L - Transmission
-
- Transmission
- Manual
- Manual
-
- Clutch
- Single Dry Plate, with Coil Spring
Hino Ranger Cargo FL 265 JW vs Mitsubishi Canter FE 74 L - Exterior
-
- Fog Lights
Hino Ranger Cargo FL 265 JW vs Mitsubishi Canter FE 74 L - Engine Details
-
- Axle Configuration
- 6x2
Add Another Truck To Comparison
Hino Ranger Cargo FL 265 JW vs Mitsubishi Canter FE 74 L - Dimensions & Capacity
-
- Fuel Tank (litres)
- 200 L
- 100 L
-
- Gross Weight
- 26000 kg
- 8250 kg
Hino Ranger Cargo FL 265 JW vs Mitsubishi Canter FE 74 L - Engine Details
-
- Engine Cylinders
- 6
- 4
-
- No. of Axles
Hino Ranger Cargo FL 265 JW vs Mitsubishi Canter FE 74 L - Miscellaneous
-
- Driver Information Display
- Yes
Hino Ranger Cargo FL 265 JW vs Mitsubishi Canter FE 74 L - Performance
-
- Fuel Type
- Diesel
- Diesel
-
- RPM at Max Power
- 2500
- 2500
Hino Ranger Cargo FL 265 JW vs Mitsubishi Canter FE 74 L - Steering
-
- Power Steering
- Yes
- Yes
-
- Steering
- Power Steering
- Power Steering
Hino Ranger Cargo FL 265 JW vs Mitsubishi Canter FE 74 L - Suspension & Brakes
-
- Chassis Type
- Chassis with Cabin
-
- Seat Type
- Standard
- Standard
Hino Ranger Cargo FL 265 JW vs Mitsubishi Canter FE 74 L - Wheel & Tyre
-
- Front Tyre
- 11.00-20.16pr
- 7.50-16-14PR
-
- Rear Tyre
- 11.00-20.16pr
- 7.50-16-14PR